4.7 Article

Classification of nutrient impact on lakes using the chironomid pupal exuvial technique

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 594-601

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.10.002

关键词

Chironomidae; Pupal exuviae; Lake; Water Framework Directive; Nutrient impact; Ecological status

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The European Union Water Framework Directive (WFD) aims to achieve Good ecological status of its waterbodies by 2015 through the determination of reference state to provide a measure of perturbation by human impacts based on taxonomic composition and abundance of aquatic species. Collections of floating pupal exuviae discarded by emerging adult midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) provide a cost-effective method for obtaining representative ecological data from lakes. Chironomid and environmental data were collected from 178 lake surveys (4 samples from each lake) of all WFD types found in Britain. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) provided species optima and niche breadths in relation to mean nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) concentrations. A nutrient impact score derived from species optima was produced for each lake survey and compared with the lake's reference score based on its physical characteristics. A range of reference lake types provided a model of physical characteristics for their observed chironomid species-derived nutrient scores. The Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) of observed to reference scores were classified into WFD quality bands based on the relative frequency of sensitive to tolerant chironomid species. Sampling errors based on EQR variation were used to determine the confidence of each lake survey classification. Species-based EQR provided a sensitive measure of a lake's perturbation from high ecological status. Analyses were repeated with genus-level data obtained in much less time and with less taxonomic expertise. Precision obtaining EQR from generic data was lower but still acceptable for providing a high confidence of lake ecological classification. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据