4.4 Article

Effects of temperature and elevation on habitat use by a rare mountain butterfly: implications for species responses to climate change

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 437-446

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.01068.x

关键词

Climate change; conservation; habitat heterogeneity; host plant; microhabitat; Parnassius apollo; thermoregulation

资金

  1. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos/Comunidad de Madrid [URJC-CM-2006-CET-0592]
  2. Spanish Ministry for Education and Science [CGL2005-06820/BOS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. The present study used the mountain specialist butterfly Parnassius apollo as a model system to investigate how climate change may alter habitat requirements for species at their warm range margins. 2. Larval habitat use was recorded in six P. apollo populations over a 700 m elevation gradient in the Sierra de Guadarrama (central Spain). Larvae used four potential host species (Sedum spp.) growing in open areas amongst shrubs. 3. Parnassius apollo host-plant and habitat use changed as elevation increased: the primary host shifted from Sedum amplexicaule to Sedum brevifolium, and larvae selected more open microhabitats (increased bare ground and dead vegetation, reduced vegetation height and shrub cover), suggesting that hotter microhabitats are used in cooler environments. 4. Larval microhabitat selection was significantly related to ambient temperature. At temperatures lower than 27 degrees C, larvae occupied open microhabitats that were warmer than ambient temperature, versus more shaded microhabitats that were cooler than ambient conditions when temperature was higher than 27 degrees C. 5. Elevational changes in phenology influenced the temperatures experienced by larvae, and could affect local host-plant favourability. 6. Habitat heterogeneity appears to play an important role in P. apollo larval thermoregulation, and may become increasingly important in buffering populations of this and other insect species against climatic variation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据