4.6 Article

Sustainability evaluation of an e-waste treatment enterprise based on emergy analysis in China

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 223-231

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.02.016

关键词

Sustainability; Emergy indices; E-waste; China

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 program) [2009AA06Z304]
  2. University of Macau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The e-waste issue is drawing increasing attention in China as a result of the country's rapid course of industrialization and modernization. The potential environmental pollution from e-waste makes evaluating the overall eco-efficiency of e-waste treatment enterprises a critical need for environmental sound management of e-waste, and a great challenge academically. The emergy analysis method can link economic and ecological systems together, highlighting the internal relationships among the different subsystems and components. Therefore, this method was used in this study to evaluate the sustainability of an e-waste treatment enterprise. Considering the characteristics of the e-waste treatment process, the traditional emergy indices were improved, and two new emergy indices were put forward to analyze the emergy recovery rate and technical level of the e-waste treatment enterprise. The research results show that the e-waste treatment enterprise can generate large economic benefits, and its environmental impact can be relatively moderate; however, the e-waste treatment enterprise had a relatively low emergy recovery rate and technical level in 2010. Finally, the emergy sustainability index (ESI) indicated that the e-waste treatment enterprise could have a sustainable contribution to both the economy and the environment for moderate periods into the future. The study will provide some useful decisions support to the enterprise managers, so that they may make appropriate policies toward sustainable development or maturation of their enterprise. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据