4.6 Article

Composition of the soil seed bank and vegetation changes after wetland drying and soil salinization on the Tibetan Plateau

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 18-24

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.017

关键词

Alpine wetland; Restoration; Saline-alkaline meadow; Soil properties; Soil seed bank; Tibetan Plateau

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41101527, 40930533]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110211120026]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2011-41]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The primary goal was to address a question with regard to whether the seed bank be regarded as a potential as a source of seeds for saline-alkaline meadow restoration on the Tibetan Plateau. We collected soil samples, soil seed bank samples, sampled the vegetation in a seasonal wetland and in a saline-alkaline meadow, and used the NMDS (nonmetric multidimensional scaling) to evaluate the relationship of species composition between the seed banks and vegetation. The saline-alkaline meadow develops after drying of wetlands following disturbance. Soil properties, and seed density and species richness were compared. The seed density and species richness of the seed banks showed no difference between the two habitats. The NMDS results showed that composition of the vegetation of the two sites was obviously different, but that of the seed bank was not. The drying of the wetland altered plant community and soil properties. Persistent seed bank can be regarded a strategy of adaptation to current soil environment (high soil moisture or salinity). There was a significant negative effect on soil characteristics after wetland drying and subsequent salinization. If hydrology is restored, the seed bank will continue to be an importance source of diversity of propagules for saline-alkaline meadow restoration following disturbance. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据