4.6 Article

Intermolecular Interactions Determine Exciton Lifetimes in Neat Films and Solid State Solutions of Metal-Free Phthalocyanine

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 119, 期 49, 页码 27340-27347

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09817

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Program in Solid State and Materials Chemistry [DMR-1307066]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Materials Research [1307066] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thin films of vapor-deposited metal-free phthalocyanine (H2Pc) were studied using ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy in the visible region. Following photoexcitation, an excited state absorption feature located near 532 nm was observed which served as a probe of the excited state. For exciton densities larger than 5 x 10(18) excitons/cm(3) the time-dependent measurements of the excited state absorption included the presence of nonexponential decay kinetics attributed to exciton-exciton annihilation. At exciton densities less than 5 x 10(18) excitons/cm(3) annihilation was negligible, and the decay kinetics appeared single exponential within the signal-to-noise. The fitted time constant, 239 +/- 24 ps, was attributed to the lifetime decay of the singlet excitons. When the H2Pc was diluted into a wide energy gap host via vapor deposition, the observed lifetime was significantly reduced, reaching 87 +/- 9 ps for a concentration of 25% H2Pc. The decreased exciton lifetime with dilution was remarkable since it has been commonly reported that excited state lifetimes decrease as the chromophore concentration is increased. The reduced lifetime was correlated to the loss of alpha-phase ordering as indicated in the UV/vis spectra of the films. Within the context of photovoltaic applications this highlights the importance of both molecular level ordering and chromophore concentration when trying to engineer fundamental material properties such as exciton diffusion length.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据