4.6 Article

Effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and community metabolic profiles in a full-scale constructed wetland

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 62-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.09.010

关键词

Subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland; Plant diversity; Microbial community; CLPP

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [30870235]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There has been less understanding of relations of microbial community patterns with plant diversitv in constructed wetlands. We conducted a single full-scale subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland (SVFCW, 1000 m(2)) study focusing on domestic wastewater processing. This study measured the size and structure of microbial community using fumigation extraction and BIOLOG Ecoplate (TM) techniques, to examine the effects of macrophyte diversity on microbial communities that are critical in treatment efficiency of constructed wetlands. We also determined the relationship of plant diversity (species richness) with its biomass production under disturbance of the same wastewater supply. Linear regression analysis showed that plant biomass production strongly correlated with plant species richness (R=0.407, P<0.001). Increase in plant species richness increased microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen (R=0.494, P<0.001; R=0.465, P<0.001) and utilization of amino acids on Ecoplates (R=0.235, P=0.03), but limited the utilization of amine/amides (R=-0.338, P=0.013). Principal components analysis (PCA) showed that the diversity and community-level physiological profiles (CLPP) of microbial community at 168 h of incubation strongly depended on the presence or absence of plant species in the SVFCW system, but not on the species richness. This is the first step toward understanding relations of plant diversity with soil microbial community patterns in constructed wetlands, but the effect of species diversity on microbial community should be further studied. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据