4.6 Article

Ion Dynamics in Li2CO3 Studied by Solid-State NMR and First-Principles Calculations

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 119, 期 43, 页码 24255-24264

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06647

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cambridge Commonwealth Trusts and Trinity College, Cambridge
  2. EU [275212]
  3. Clare Hall, University of Cambridge
  4. Weizmann Institute of Science-National Postdoctoral Award for Advancing Women in Science
  5. EU Marie Curie intra-European fellowship
  6. EU ERC
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K039687/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/K039687/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel lithium-based materials for carbon capture and storage (CCS) applications have emerged as a promising class of materials for use in CO2 looping, where the material reacts reversibly with CO2 to form Li2CO3, among other phases depending on the parent phase. Much work has been done to try and understand the origin of the continued reactivity of the process even after a layer of Li2CO3 has covered the sorbent particles. In this work, we have studied the lithium and oxygen ion dynamics in Li2CO3 over the temperature range of 293 973 K in order to elucidate the link between dynamics and reactivity in this system. We have used a combination of powder X-ray diffraction, solid-state NMR spectroscopy, and theoretical calculations to chart the temperature dependence of both structural changes and ion dynamics in the sample. These methods together allowed us to determine the activation energy for both lithium ion hopping processes and carbonate ion rotations in Li2CO3. Importantly, we have shown that these processes may be coupled in this material, with the initial carbonate ion rotations aiding the subsequent hopping of lithium ions within the structure. Additionally, this study shows that it is possible to measure dynamic processes in powder or crystalline materials indirectly through a combination of NMR spectroscopy and theoretical calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据