4.7 Article

Coral identity underpins architectural complexity on Caribbean reefs

期刊

ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 2223-2231

出版社

ECOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1890/10-1563.1

关键词

biodiversity; coral; Cozumel; Mexico; dominance; functional groups; habitat complexity; landscape ecology; reef

资金

  1. Parque Nacional Arrecifes de Cozumel
  2. Comision Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas of Mexico
  3. CONACYT [171864]
  4. SEP
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada
  6. Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The architectural complexity of ecosystems can greatly influence their capacity to support biodiversity and deliver ecosystem services. Understanding the components underlying this complexity can aid the development of effective strategies for ecosystem conservation. Caribbean coral reefs support and protect millions of livelihoods, but recent anthropogenic change is shifting communities toward reefs dominated by stress-resistant coral species, which are often less architecturally complex. With the regionwide decline in reef fish abundance, it is becoming increasingly important to understand changes in coral reef community structure and function. We quantify the influence of coral composition, diversity, and morpho-functional traits on the architectural complexity of reefs across 91 sites at Cozumel, Mexico. Although reef architectural complexity increases with coral cover and species richness, it is highest on sites that are low in taxonomic evenness and dominated by morpho-functionally important, reef-building coral genera, particularly Montastraea. Sites with similar coral community composition also tend to occur on reefs with very similar architectural complexity, suggesting that reef structure tends to be determined by the same key species across sites. Our findings provide support for prioritizing and protecting particular reef types, especially those dominated by key reef-building corals, in order to enhance reef complexity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据