4.7 Article

Spatial controls of occurrence and spread of wildfires in the Missouri Ozark Highlands

期刊

ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 1212-1225

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/07-0825.1

关键词

burn probability; fire risk; LANDIS; Ozark Highlands, USA; spatial point pattern; wildfire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding spatial controls on wild. res is important when designing adaptive. re management plans and optimizing fuel treatment locations on a forest landscape. Previous research about this topic focused primarily on spatial controls for. re origin locations alone. Fire spread and behavior were largely overlooked. This paper contrasts the relative importance of biotic, abiotic, and anthropogenic constraints on the spatial pattern of reoccurrence with that on burn probability (i. e., the probability that fire will spread to a particular location). Spatial point pattern analysis and landscape succession. re model ( LANDIS) were used to create maps to show the contrast. We quanti. ed spatial controls on both. re occurrence and. re spread in the Midwest Ozark Highlands region, USA. This area exhibits a typical anthropogenic surface. re regime. We found that (1) human accessibility and land ownership were primary limiting factors in shaping clustered. re origin locations; (2) vegetation and topography had a negligible in. uence on fire occurrence in this anthropogenic regime; (3) burn probability was higher in grassland and open woodland than in closedcanopy forest, even though fire occurrence density was less in these vegetation types; and (4) biotic and abiotic factors were secondary descriptive ingredients for determining the spatial patterns of burn probability. This study demonstrates how fire occurrence and spread interact with landscape patterns to affect the spatial distribution of wildfire risk. The application of spatial point pattern data analysis would also be valuable to researchers working on landscape forest fire models to integrate historical ignition location patterns in fire simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据