4.4 Article

Inter- and intraspecific variation of stemflow production from Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American beech) and Liriodendron tulipifera L. (yellow poplar) in relation to bark microrelief in the eastern United States

期刊

ECOHYDROLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 11-19

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eco.83

关键词

stemflow; funneling ratio; Fagus grandifolia; Liriodendron tulipfera; interspecific variability; intraspecific variability; tree aged; bark microrelief

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stemflow is a spatially concentrated hydrologic input Lit the tree base. Prior work has documented the differential effects of stemflow from a wide range of plant species on ecohydrological processes, Such as the alteration of soil pH and spatial patterning of understory vegetation. No known work has coupled stemflow yield with high resolution measurements of bark microrelief that definitively ascribe differential stemflow yield to bark microrelief. As Such, our research objectives were to: (1) correlate inter- and intraspecific variation in stemflow yield to a quantitative bark microrelief scale and (2) compare and contrast stemflow for two co-occurring deciduous species-Fagus grandifolio Ehrh. (American beech) and Liriodendron tulipifera L. (yellow poplar). Using a newly developed instrument to measure bark microrelief, namely the LasetBark (TM) automated tree measurement system, in combination with in 11-month stemflow database for a broadleaved deciduous forest in eastern North America, it was found that bark microrelief values significantly differed between the two species [P = 0.000, F (1,19) = 49.32]. Funneling ratios [P = 0.000, H (1, 990) = 339.20] and stemflow generation [P = 0.000. H (1, 990) = 146.75] also significantly differed between the two species. Our results indicate that bark microrelief exerts a considerable effect oil stemflow yield from F. grandifolia and L. tulipfera, possibly affecting water and solute flux to the forest floor. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据