4.6 Article

Activation of Hematite Photoanodes for Solar Water Splitting: Effect of FTO Deformation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 119, 期 7, 页码 3810-3817

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp512189c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A6A3A04038530]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A6A3A04038530] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sintering at 800 degrees C is found to induce the diffusion of Sn from the F-doped SnO2 (FTO) into the hematite lattice, enhancing the photoelectrochemical cell (PEC) properties of the hematite photoanodes, but this diffusion also has detrimental effects on the conductivity of the FTO substrate. In the present research we examined the role of FTO deformation during the activation of hematite photoanodes synthesized on FTO substrates. The incorporation of Sn dopants from the FTO substrates in the hematite lattice was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and was found to increase with sintering time. Further from the extended X-ray absorption fine structure analysis, it was found that the diffused Sn atoms affected the metal sites of the hematite lattice. Increased diffusion of Sn into the hematite lattice caused structural disordering of the FTO, but optimum sintering time compensated for the structural disordering and improved the ordering. Under high-temperature annealing at 800 degrees C, the FTO substrates underwent a stoichiometric change that directly affected their electrical conductivity; their resistivity was doubled after 20 min of sintering. Activation of hematite photoanodes by high-temperature sintering entails a kinetic competition between Sn dopant diffusion from the FTO substrate into the hematite and the resulting thermal deformation and conductivity loss in the FTO substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据