4.7 Article

Tools for integrating range change, extinction risk and climate change information into conservation management

期刊

ECOGRAPHY
卷 36, 期 9, 页码 956-964

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00147.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP1096427, FT100100200, FS110200051]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the NASA Biodiversity Program [LP0989537, NNX09AK19G]
  3. Portuguese FCT grant [PTDC/AAC-AMB/98163/2008]
  4. 'Rui Nabeiro' Biodiversity Chair
  5. Danish NSF
  6. NASA [NNX09AK19G, 115458] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecological niche models (ENMs) are the primary tool used to describe and forecast the potential influence of climate change on biodiversity. However, ENMs do not directly account for important biological and landscape processes likely to affect range dynamics at a variety of spatial scales. Recent advances to link ENMs with population models have focused on the fundamental step of integrating dispersal and metapopulation dynamics into forecasts of species geographic ranges. Here we use a combination of novel analyses and a synthesis of findings from published plant and animal case studies to highlight three seldom recognised, yet important, advantages of linking ENMs with demographic modelling approaches: 1) they provide direct measures of extinction risk in addition to measures of vulnerability based on change in the potential range area or total habitat suitability. 2) They capture life-history traits that permit population density to vary in different ways in response to key spatial drivers, conditioned by the processes of global change. 3) They can be used to explore and rank the cost effectiveness of regional conservation alternatives and demographically oriented management interventions. Given these advantages, we argue that coupled methods should be used preferentially where data permits and when conservation management decisions require intervention, prioritization, or direct estimates of extinction risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据