4.7 Article

Rapid changes in bird community composition at multiple temporal and spatial scales in response to recent climate change

期刊

ECOGRAPHY
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 313-322

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07799.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
  2. County Administrative Boards in Sweden (RUS)
  3. County Administrative Board of Vasterbotten
  4. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas)
  5. project FABIO
  6. PHYBIO
  7. la Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversite
  8. Centre for Animal Movement Research at Lund Univ. (CAnMove, Linnaeus grant) [349-2007-8690]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although climate change is acknowledged to affect population dynamics and species distribution, details of how community composition is affected are still lacking. We investigate whether ongoing changes in bird community composition can be explained by contemporary changes in summer temperatures, using four independent long-term bird census schemes from Sweden (up to 57 yr); two at the national scale and two at local scales. The change in bird community composition was represented by a community temperature index (CTI) that reflects the balance in abundance between low- and high-temperature dwelling species. In all schemes, CTI tracked patterns of temperature increase, stability or decrease remarkably well, with a lag period of 13 yr. This response was similar at both the national and local scale. However, the communities did not respond fast enough to cope with temperature increase, suggesting that community composition lags behind changes in temperature. The change in CTI was caused mainly by changes in species' relative abundances, and less so by changes in species composition. We conclude that ongoing changes in bird community structure are driven to a large extent by contemporary changes in climate and that CTI can be used as a simple indicator for how bird communities respond.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据