4.7 Article

Using species co-occurrence networks to assess the impacts of climate change

期刊

ECOGRAPHY
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 897-908

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06919.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. CSIC-PUC International Laboratory for Global Change (LINC-Global)
  2. EC FP6 ECOCHANGE [036866-GOCE]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CGL2008-01198-E/BOS]
  4. Danish National Research Foundation
  5. FONDECYT-FONDAP [1501-0001]
  6. ICM [P05-002]
  7. CONICYT [PFB-23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Viable populations of species occur in a given place if three conditions are met: the environment at the place is suitable; the species is able to colonize it; co-occurrence is possible despite or because of interactions with other species. Studies investigating the effects of climate change on species have mainly focused on measuring changes in climate suitability. Complex interactions among species have rarely been explored in such studies. We extend network theory to the analysis of complex patterns of co-occurrence among species. The framework is used to explore the robustness of networks under climate change. With our data, we show that networks describing the geographic pattern of co-occurrence among species display properties shared by other complex networks, namely that most species are poorly connected to other species in the network and only a few are highly connected. In our example, species more exposed to climate change tended to be poorly connected to other species within the network, while species more connected tended to be less exposed. Such high connectance would make the co-occurrence networks more robust to climate change. The proposed framework illustrates how network analysis could be used, together with co-occurrence data, to help addressing the potential consequences of species interactions in studies of climate change and biodiversity. However, more research is needed to test for links between co-occurrence and network interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据