4.1 Article

Effects of Ranolazine on Noninvasive Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients with Myocardial Ischemia But without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/echo.12674

关键词

ranolazine; coronary flow reserve; stress echocardiography; dipyridamole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IntroductionRanolazine reduces the Na-dependent calcium overload via inhibition of the late sodium current, improving diastolic tone and oxygen handling during myocardial ischemia. In patients with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), abnormal coronary autoregulation plays a key role. Transthoracic Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) is an index of coronary arterial reactivity and decreases in both microvascular dysfunction and coronary artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of ranolazine on CFR in this group of patient. MethodsFifty-eight (39M, 19F) patients with angina and evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive CAD, were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were assigned to ranolazine (29) or placebo (29) for 8weeks (up to 500mg twice a day). CFR was determined as the ratio of hyperemic, induced by intravenous dypiridamole administration, to baseline diastolic coronary flow velocity. CFR was assessed before and after 8-week therapy. ResultsCFR was successfully performed in all patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and CFR between ranolazine and placebo group. After 8weeks CFR significantly increased in ranolazine group (2.540.44 vs. 1.91 +/- 0.31; P=0.005) but not in placebo group (1.99 +/- 0.32 vs. 1.94 +/- 0.29; P=ns). No patient dropped out during 8weeks therapy. Side effects were similar in both groups. ConclusionsRanolazine is able to improve CFR in these patients. This is probably due to improvement in abnormal coronary autoregulation, both reducing baseline diastolic coronary flow velocity and increasing hyperemic diastolic coronary flow velocity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据