4.6 Article

Conditional simulation of spatially variable seismic ground motions based on evolutionary spectra

期刊

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
卷 41, 期 15, 页码 2125-2139

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2178

关键词

conditional simulation; seismic ground motion; nonstationary; evolutionary spectra

资金

  1. Hong Kong Polytechnic University through its Niche Area Program [PolyU 1-BB20, 1-BB68]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [90715008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a computational procedure for the conditional simulation of spatially variable seismic ground motions for long span bridges with multiple supports. The seismic ground motions, with part of their time histories measured at some supports, are regarded as zero-mean nonstationary random processes characterized by predefined evolutionary power spectral density. To conditionally simulate unknown seismic ground motion time histories at other supports, the Kriging method is first described briefly for the conditional simulation of a random vector comprised of zero-mean Gaussian variables. The multivariate oscillatory processes characterized by the evolutionary power spectral density matrix are then introduced, and the Fourier coefficients of the oscillatory processes and their covariance matrix are derived. By applying the Kriging method to the random vector of the Fourier coefficients and using the inverse Fourier transform, unknown nonstationary seismic ground motion time histories can be simulated. A numerical example is selected to demonstrate capabilities of the proposed simulation procedure, and the results show that the procedure can ensure unbiased time-varying correlation functions, especially the cross correlation between known and unknown time histories. The procedure is finally applied to the Tsing Ma suspension bridge in Hong Kong to generate ground accelerations at its multiple supports using limited seismic records. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据