4.7 Review

Constraints to the timing of India-Eurasia collision; a re-evaluation of evidence from the Indus Basin sedimentary rocks of the Indus-Tsangpo Suture Zone, Ladakh, India

期刊

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 106, 期 3-4, 页码 265-292

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.02.006

关键词

Himalaya; India-Asia collision; Indus-Tsangpo suture zone; Indus molasse

资金

  1. NERC [NE/D000092/1, NER/S/A/2006/14020]
  2. NIGL
  3. Scottish Universities
  4. NERC [nigl010001, aif10001, NE/D00876X/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [aif10001, NE/D00876X/2, nigl010001, NE/D000092/1, ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deposited within the Indus-Tsangpo suture zone, the Cenozoic Indus Basin sedimentary rocks have been interpreted to hold evidence that may constrain the timing of India-Eurasia collision, a conclusion challenged by data presented here. The Eurasian derived 50.8-51 Ma Chogdo Formation was previously considered to overlie Indian Plate marine sedimentary rocks in sedimentary contact, thus constraining the timing of collision as having occurred by this time. Using isotopic analysis (U-Pb dating on detrital zircons, Ar-Ar dating on detrital white mica, Sm-Nd analyses on detrital apatite), sandstone and conglomerate petrography, mudstone geochemistry, facies analysis and geological mapping to characterize and correlate the formations of the Indus Basin Sedimentary rocks, we review the nature of these contacts and the identification and correlation of the formations. Our results reveal that previously interpreted stratigraphic contacts identifying Chogdo Formation unconformably overlying Indian plate sedimentary rocks are incorrect. Rather, we suggest that the inaccuracy of previous interpretations is most likely a result of Formation misidentification and thus cannot be used to constrain the timing of India-Asia collision. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据