4.4 Article

The role of glacial isostatic adjustment in the present-day crustal motion and sea levels of East Asia

期刊

EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE
卷 63, 期 8, 页码 915-928

出版社

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.5047/eps.2011.05.002

关键词

Glacial isostatic adjustment; lateral heterogeneity; crustal motion; sea levels; East Asia

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fundation of China [40825012, 41021003, 41174016]
  2. CAS/SAFEA
  3. KLDG Laboratory of CAS [L09-02, L09-18]
  4. NSERC of Canada
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  6. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011BAK12B02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this paper is to model and remove the contribution of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) from the observed crustal velocities and sea-level rates in East Asia, so that the signal from other geological processes such as tectonic uplift or global change can be better revealed. State-of-the-art GIA models that include 3D variations in mantle viscosity and lithospheric thickness are employed in this study. Uncertainties of the GIA response are estimated from different ice history and background viscosity models. It is demonstrated that the uncertainties in the GIA response in East Asia are generally small compared with the response itself. For example, the land uplift rate near the east coast of China due to GIA has magnitudes of about 0.1 mm/yr while the uncertainties are generally less than 0.04 mm/yr. These are small compared with the observed magnitude of uplift rate (similar to 1.0 mm/yr) and the measurement uncertainties of GPS. For the height rates in leveling observation, relative sea-level rates in tide gauge data, absolute seal-level rates from satellite altimetry and tangential velocities from GPS data, the GIA effects are also shown to be generally small compared with observed data. This technique of cleaning geodetic data will become more useful in the future when the uncertainties of geodetic measurements can be reduced to less than 0.1 mm/yr.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据