4.4 Article

Behaviour of the quiet-day geomagnetic variation at Livingston Island and variability of the S-q focus position in the South American-Antarctic Peninsula region

期刊

EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 297-307

出版社

TERRA SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO
DOI: 10.5047/eps.2009.11.004

关键词

S-q variation; quiet day; focus position; Livingston Island Observatory; South American-Antarctic Peninsula region; ionospheric current system; solar cycle 23

资金

  1. MEC [CGL2006-12437-0O2-02/ANT]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characteristics of the regular daily variation, including seasonal and solar cycle variabilites, at the relatively new geomagnetic observatory of Livingston Island (Antarctica) have been studied. Such studies of solar cycle variability were possible due to the current availability of more than 11 years of definitive data. The seasonal behaviour of the quiet-time daily field variations are in agreement with those of earlier studies for a mid-latitude observatory placed at the south of the southern hemisphere current focus. We also found a clear dependence of the S-q amplitude on solar activity, although the Sq amplitude maximum occurs about 2 years later than the sunspot maximum. An analysis of contemporary data for solar cycle 23 was carried out for observatories located in the same longitudinal sector, with the aim of identifying the latitudinal displacements of the current focus that affect the observed Sq variations. This was also determined for solar cycle 20 using data from a different set of observatories. The uncertainties associated with the method employed for determining the focus positions are due to the scarcity of observatory data in the South American-Antarctic Peninsula region, but based on our analysis, we can state with a certain reliability that focus latitudes are higher during the summer and at equinoxes than during the winter. However, it is difficult to establish a correlation between focus latitudes and solar sunspot numbers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据