4.7 Article

Seismic velocity variations at TCDP are controlled by MJO driven precipitation pattern and high fluid discharge properties

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 391, 期 -, 页码 121-127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.040

关键词

ambient noise; monitoring; Madden-Julian oscillation; borehole seismology; ground water table

资金

  1. European Research Council [Whisper L27507]
  2. German Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using seismic noise based monitoring techniques we find that seismic velocity variations (dv/v) observed with the borehole array of the Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project (TCDP) are controlled by strong precipitation events associated with the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO), a dynamic intraseasonal atmospheric pattern in the tropical atmosphere. High-frequency noise (>1 Hz) excited by steady anthropogenic activity in the vicinity of the TCDP allows daily resolution of dv/v time series. Relatively large fluid discharge properties control the equilibration of the ground water table and hence seismic velocities on time scales smaller than the average precipitation recurrence interval. This leads to the observed synchronous 50-80 day periodicity in dv/v and rainfall records in addition to the dominant annual component. Further evidence for the governing role of hydraulic properties is inferred from the similarity of observed dv/v timing, amplitude, and recovery properties with dv/v synthetics generated by a combined model of ground water table changes and diffusive propagation of seismic energy. The lapse time (tau) dependent increase of dv/v amplitudes is controlled by the sensitivity of the diffuse wave field sampled at 1100 m depth to shallower water level fluctuations. The significant vertical offset between stations and water level explains the direct tau dependence which is opposite to the trend previously inferred from measurements at the surface. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据