4.7 Article

Strike-slip earthquakes can also be detected in the ionosphere

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 180-193

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.024

关键词

strike-slip earthquakes; co-seismic ionospheric disturbances (CID); TEC response; GPS; co-seismic uplift; tsunamis

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program [307998]
  2. ANR [ANR-11-JAPN-008]
  3. Office of Naval Research (ONR) Global under contract TWIST [N000141310035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is generally assumed that co-seismic ionospheric disturbances are generated by large vertical static displacements of the ground during an earthquake. Consequently, it is expected that co-seismic ionospheric disturbances are only observable after earthquakes with a significant dip-slip component. Therefore, earthquakes dominated by strike-slip motion, i.e. with very little vertical co-seismic component, are not expected to generate ionospheric perturbations. In this work, we use total electron content (TEC) measurements from ground-based GNSS-receivers to study ionospheric response to six recent largest strike-slip earthquakes: the Mw7.8 Kunlun earthquake of 14 November 2001, the Mw8.1 Macquarie earthquake of 23 December 2004, the Sumatra earthquake doublet, Mw8.6 and Mw8.2, of 11 April 2012, the Mw7.7 Balochistan earthquake of 24 September 2013 and the Mw 7.7 Scotia Sea earthquake of 17 November 2013. We show that large strike-slip earthquakes generate large ionospheric perturbations of amplitude comparable with those induced by dip-slip earthquakes of equivalent magnitude. We consider that in the absence of significant vertical static co-seismic displacements of the ground, other seismological parameters (primarily the magnitude of co-seismic horizontal displacements, seismic fault dimensions, seismic slip) may contribute in generation of large-amplitude ionospheric perturbations. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据