4.7 Article

Morphometric and geometric characterization of normal faults on Mars

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 401, 期 -, 页码 83-94

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.05.022

关键词

Mars; normal faults; dip angle; scarp degradation

资金

  1. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia) [FRH/BPD/72371/2010, PEst-OE/CTE/UI0611/2012-CGUC, PTDC/CTE-SPA/117786/2010]
  2. NASA [NNH09ZDA001N]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/CTE-SPA/117786/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using three different approaches (fault plane fitting, 3D crater rim palinspatic restorations and fault scarps morphometric analysis) we investigate the geometry and degradation history of Martian normal faults in two distinct areas. The three independent methods produce similar results, indicating that the average dip angle of the normal faults on these two locations is probably below the value that is usually assumed for Mars (similar to 60 degrees). Our best estimate for this average dip angle is 46.8 +/- 9.8 degrees, which is a value comparable with the mean dip angle inferred on Earth for seismically active normal faults. This lower average dip angle implies that all the rift strain estimates performed until now might be underestimated. From the comparative analysis of the two faulted regions (Phlegethon Catena and Claritas Fossae), we show that local and regional dip variabilities may exist on Mars. This reinforces the idea that the amount of extension associated with Martian rifts must be reconsidered. We also demonstrate the advantages of performing a comparative morphometric analysis of fault scarps. This approach enables the reconstruction of the faults scarps degradation history and can be used to evaluate how environmental conditions changed through time. After modeling the degradation of the fault scarps at the two sites we conclude that the observed morphometric variations are mainly due to the different faulting ages in an environment characterized by low scarp degradation rates (4 x 10(-3) m(2)/kyr) over the last 3 Ga. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据