4.7 Article

Quantifying the impact of riverine particulate dissolution in seawater on ocean chemistry

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 395, 期 -, 页码 91-100

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.039

关键词

global element cycles; strontium; suspended particles; dissolution; estuaries; fluxes

资金

  1. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship [PIEF-GA-2009-254495]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I020571/2, NE/B502701/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/I020571/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quantification of the sources and sinks of elements to the oceans forms the basis of our understanding of global geochemical cycles and the chemical evolution of the Earth's surface. There is, however, a large imbalance in the current best estimates of the global fluxes to the oceans for many elements. In the case of strontium (Sr), balancing the input from rivers would require a much greater mantle-derived component than is possible from hydrothermal water flux estimates at mid-ocean ridges. Current estimates of riverine fluxes are based entirely on measurements of dissolved metal concentrations, and neglect the impact of riverine particulate dissolution in seawater. Here we present 87(Sr)/86(Sr) isotope data from an Icelandic estuary, which demonstrate rapid Sr release from the riverine particulates. We calculate that this Sr release is 1.1-7.5 times greater than the corresponding dissolved riverine flux. If such behaviour is typical of volcanic particulates worldwide, this release could account for 6-45% of the perceived marine Sr budget imbalance, with continued element release over longer timescales further reducing the deficit. Similar release from particulate material will greatly affect the marine budgets of many other elements, changing our understanding of coastal productivity, and anthropogenic effects such as soil erosion and the damming of rivers. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据