4.7 Article

Mass wasting features on the Moon - how active is the lunar surface?

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 376, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.06.015

关键词

lunar; mass wasting; impact crater; impact melt; regolith

资金

  1. NSFC (Natural Science Foundation of China) [41274181]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [100703]
  3. Chinese Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mass wasting features have long been noticed on the Moon, but there has been no systematic studies for their morphological, geometrical, or distribution characteristics. The effect of mass wasting on topographic evolution and surface erosion on the Moon is not fully understood. Using high-resolution image and topography data obtained from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft, we found that mass wasting has been globally and continuously occurring on the Moon. Meteor impacts and moonquakes are the two major triggering mechanisms in forming lunar mass wasting features. We selected over 300 examples of lunar mass wasting features and classified them as falls, flows, slides, slumps, and creeps after studying their morphology, potential mode of emplacement, and sizes of displaced materials. The slope and age distributions for their host terrains are studied to estimate the topographic evolutionary sequence of the lunar surface under the effect of mass wasting. Due to continuous reshaping by mass wasting, surface topographies on the Moon tend to become smoother with time, with fewer mass wasting events occurring on older surfaces. Pre-Nectarian surfaces may represent the final stage of surface topographic evolution on slope angles regarding the effect of mass wasting. Crater densities on lunar surfaces vary with slope angles because the surface erosion rate and regolith production rate on slopes are larger than those on flat areas. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据