4.7 Article

Thermomechanics of shallow magma chamber pressurization: Implications for the assessment of ground deformation data at active volcanoes

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 384, 期 -, 页码 100-108

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.09.040

关键词

finite element model; magma reservoir; overpressure; ground deformation; Santorini; viscoelastic rheology

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR 0815101, EAR 0838536, EAR 0908324]
  2. National Science Foundation, a CEOAS Institutional Postdoc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we utilize thermomechanical models to investigate how magma chambers overpressurize as the result of either magmatic recharge or volatile exsolution. By implementing an adaptive reservoir boundary condition we are able to track how overpressure dissipates as the magma chamber expands to accommodate internal volume changes. We find that the size of the reservoir greatly impacts the resultant magma chamber overpressure. In particular, overpressure estimates for small to moderate-sized reservoirs (1-10 km(3)) are up to 70% lower than previous analytical predictions. We apply our models to Santorini volcano in Greece where recent seismic activity and ground deformation observations suggested the potential for eruption. The incorporation of an adaptive boundary condition reproduces Mogi flux estimates and suggests that the magma reservoir present at Santorini may be quite large. Furthermore, model results suggest that if the magma chamber is >100 km(3), overpressures generated due to the high magma flux may not exceed the strength of the host rock, thus requiring an additional triggering mechanism for eruption. Although the adaptive boundary condition approach does not calculate the internal evolution of the magma reservoir, it represents a fundamental step forward from elastic Mogi models and fixed boundary solutions on which future investigations of the evolution of the magma can be built. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据