4.7 Article

Melt and collapse of buried water ice: An alternative hypothesis for the formation of chaotic terrains on Mars

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 297, 期 3-4, 页码 496-504

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.049

关键词

Mars; chaotic terrain; heat flux; outflow channel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chaotic terrains and the associated massive outflow channels are some of the most enigmatic features on Mars. Over hundreds of kilometres of rock units are fractured, tilted, and have subsided, forming chaotic terrain basins (Sharp, 1973). Large quantities of water emanated from these chaotic terrains in short periods of time in the Hesperian epoch (similar to 3.7-3.3 Ga), carving huge outflow channels, thousands of kilometres long, and more than 1 km deep (Baker, 2001). However, the subsurface mechanism by which chaotic terrains form, and thereby suddenly produce very large quantities of water (>10(5) km(3)) is poorly understood. Here we explore if these features can form by melting and collapse of buried water ice in a confined basin. 2D thermal modelling, using boundary conditions derived from the geology of Aram Chaos, demonstrates that a buried ice unit will start melting when 1-2 km of overburden has accumulated. The thickness of the liquid subsurface layer depends primarily on the crustal heat flux, the thermal conductivity of the overburden sediments, and the surface temperature. A subsurface liquid water layer of 1 to 2 km can be achieved under present day surface temperature conditions and a crustal heat flux of 15-30 mW m(-2). To a first order, the geological features of chaotic terrains and their outflow channels are consistent with a scenario in which a subsurface lake forms by melting of buried water ice, followed by collapse and rapid outflow of water. If correct, this hypothesis suggests that subsurface lakes on Mars may have existed for extensive (>100 Ma) periods of time. Such subsurface lakes would be of major interest for astrobiology. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据