4.7 Article

Thermodynamics of silicate liquids in the deep Earth

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 278, 期 3-4, 页码 226-232

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.12.006

关键词

Earth's mantle; silicate liquids; origin of Earth; core-mantle boundary

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-0409074, EAR-0409121]
  2. Division Of Earth Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [0809489] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F017871/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/F017871/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We discuss the geophysical implications of recent first principles molecular dynamics simulations of MgSiO3 liquid, in particular the findings that the Gruneisen parameter increases by a factor of three on two-fold compression, and the predicted melting curve. The predicted melting temperature Of MgSiO3 perovskite at 136 GPa is 5400 +/- 600 K, which if lowered by freezing point depression by 1300 K, yields a mantle solidus temperature of 4100 K, identical to recent estimates of the temperature at the base of the mantle. We argue on this basis that partial melting at the base of the mantle is plausible. While MgSiO3 perovskite is denser than the isochemical liquid, reasonable values of iron partitioning and bulk iron contents, leads to the conclusion that a melt at the base of the multi-component mantle would be denser than its surroundings and therefore buoyantly stable. We predict the bulk sound velocity of this melt to be 10.9 km s(-1), less than that of ultra-low velocity zones, and consistent with the explanation of these regions as being due to partial melting. The increase on compression of the Gruneisen parameter in the liquid state yields isentropes that are much hotter than previously thought: a potential temperature of only 2450 K is sufficient to melt the entire mantle, and a magma ocean will begin crystallization at mid-mantle depths, rather than at the base of the mantle. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据