4.3 Article

Basic numerical processes in very preterm children: A critical transition from preschool to school age

期刊

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 103-111

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.11.003

关键词

Preterm birth; Magnitude comparison; Number knowledge; Symbolic representation

资金

  1. University of Bologna [FFB0125181]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Serious difficulties in formal mathematical skills have been identified in preterm children. By contrast, basic-level numerical skills like magnitude judgments have not yet been tested in these children. Aims: The aim of the present research was to investigate whether preterm birth also affects these basic numerical abilities, with particular attention to the transition from preschool to formal education. Method: One hundred-forty very preterm children and 60 age-matched controls were recruited in a cross-sectional study at 6 and 8 years of age. Magnitude comparison tasks with non-symbolic dot displays or symbolic Arabic-number stimuli, measuring accuracy and reaction time, were administered to participants. We also investigated explicit number knowledge, as well as general cognitive developmental levels, to gain a broader picture of preterm abilities. Results: Despite no general cognitive delay, the more simple approximate non-symbolic representation of numerical magnitude was affected by preterm birth, with slower reaction times at both ages compared to controls. Additionally, clear difficulties in the construction of the symbolic representation of numerical magnitude and in explicit number knowledge emerged in the 6-year-old preterm children, with a recovery from this serious delay finally by 8 years. Conclusions: The serious delays identified here in basic numerical abilities in preterm children, despite normal IQ point to the need for further studies in order to elucidate the relationship between basic numerical abilities and subsequent difficulties in formal mathematic achievement at school. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据