4.3 Article

Maternal interactive behaviour as a predictor of preschoolers' attachment representations among full term and premature samples

期刊

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
卷 89, 期 5, 页码 349-354

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.11.006

关键词

Attachment; Maternal sensitivity; Prematurity; Representations; Internal working models; Disorganization; Narratives

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [32-49712.96]
  2. Fondation pour la Psychiatrie de la Petite Enfance (Lausanne)
  3. Foundation Biaggi (Lausanne)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Associations between maternal sensitivity and child attachment have been established in many samples, but the strength of the association varies across populations. The sensitivity-attachment link has never been examined at the level of representations nor among premature samples. Objective: The present study is aimed at exploring associations between maternal interactive behaviour and children's attachment representations in a population of preterm and full-term infants. Method: Maternal interactive behaviour was assessed at 6 and 18 months (Ainsworth Sensitivity Scale & Care Index) and children's attachment representations were measured at 42 months (Attachment Story Completion Task) in a sample of preterm (N = 48) and full-term (N = 23) infants. Results: Maternal unresponsiveness at 6 months and sensitivity at 18 months explained 54% of the variance of disorganized attachment representations in the full-term group but was not significantly related to attachment patterns in the preterm group. Conclusion: These results corroborate previous work on the causes of disorganized attachment and also point to the need to consider the development of attachment differently for children evolving in specific developmental contexts. They especially stress the importance of distinguishing between risk factors associated with the mother as opposed to the child. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据