4.3 Article

Prenatal stress and infant affective reactivity at five months of age

期刊

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 129-136

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.11.014

关键词

Prenatal stress; Cortisol; Behavioural inhibition; Infant reactivity

资金

  1. Graduate Academy of the University of Heidelberg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Prospective studies concerning prenatal stress and its outcome on children's emotional development postulated a potential influence of prenatal hormonal levels or emotional stressors on child development [1-3]. In a retrospective study, an influence of maternal emotional stress on infant affective reactivity was found [4]. Aims: This study was conducted in order to confirm these findings in a prospective study design. Study design: A prospective longitudinal study design was conducted with three study waves during pregnancy and one time point five months postnatally. Subjects: The final sample consisted of n=104 mother-infant dyads. Outcome measures: Maternal baseline cortisol levels and emotional stress were assessed in each trimester of pregnancy. Children were examined with the infant reactivity battery according to Kagan & Snidman (Slat the age of five months. Results: Mothers of children with high affective reactivity (cry score >= 7) were significantly less depressed (p<.10) and perceived less stress (p<.05) in mid-pregnancy and were confronted with less external stress factors (p<.10) at the end of pregnancy. Cortisol levels did not differ in both groups in any pregnancy trimenon (p>.05). Conclusions: These data add a new specific aspect to the fetal programming hypothesis' and are the first to confirm the speculative data from retrospective studies. Baseline cortisol does not seem to be the 'hormonal mediator' of this association. Therefore, cortisol stress reactivity or other neuroendocrine mechanisms should be assessed in future studies. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据