4.3 Article

Kangaroo Care modifies preterm infant heart rate variability in response to heel stick pain: Pilot study

期刊

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
卷 85, 期 9, 页码 561-567

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.05.012

关键词

Pain; Heel stick; Kangaroo Care; Heart rate variability; Preterm infants

资金

  1. AWHONN
  2. National Institute of Nursing Research, NIH [RO3NR08587-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Heel stick is the most common painful procedure for preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units. Resultant pain causes adverse physiological effects in major organ systems. Kangaroo Care (KC). involving mother-infant skin-to-skin contact is a promising analgesic for infant pain; however, the effect of KC on the autonomic nervous system's response to pain is unknown. Aim: To determine if KC results in improved balance in autonomic responses to heel stick pain than the standard method where infants remain in an incubator care (IC) for the heel stick. Study design: A randomized cross-over trial. Subjects: Fourteen preterm infants. 30-32 weeks gestational age and less than 9 days postnatal age. Outcome measures: Infant behavioral state, heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV) indices including low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) power, and the LF/HF ratio measured over Baseline, Heel Warming, Heel Stick, and Recovery periods in KC and IC conditions. Results: HRV differences between KC and IC were that LF was higher in KC at Baseline (p < .01) and at Heel Stick (p < .001), and HF was higher in KC at Baseline than in the IC condition (p < .05). The LF/HF ratio had less fluctuation across the periods in KC than in IC condition and was significantly lower during Recovery in KC than in IC (p < .001). Conclusions: Infants experienced better balance in response in KC than IC condition as shown by more autonomic stability during heel stick. KC may be helpful in mediating physiologic response to painful procedures in preterm. infants. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据