4.3 Article

Development, Reliability, and Validation of an Infant Mammalian Penetration-Aspiration Scale

期刊

DYSPHAGIA
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 178-187

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-012-9427-8

关键词

Aspiration; Penetration; Airway protection; Videofluoroscopy; Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Animal models

资金

  1. AADR Student Research Fellowship [T32 DE07309]
  2. NIH [DC03604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A penetration-aspiration scale exists for assessing airway protection in adult videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic swallowing studies; however, no such scale exists for animal models. The aim of this study was threefold: (1) develop a penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) for infant mammals, (2) test the scale's intra- and interrater reliabilities, and (3) validate the use of the scale for distinguishing between abnormal and normal animals. After discussion and reviewing many videos, the result was a 7-point infant mammal PAS. Reliability was tested by having five judges score 90 swallows recorded with videofluoroscopy across two time points. In these videos, the frame rate was either 30 or 60 frames per second and the animals were either normal, had a unilateral superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) lesion, or had hard palate local anesthesia. The scale was validated by having one judge score videos of both normal and SLN lesioned pigs and testing the difference using a t test. Raters had a high intrarater reliability [average kappa = 0.82, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.92] and high interrater reliability (average kappa = 0.68, ICC = 0.66). There was a significant difference in reliability for videos captured at 30 and 60 frames per second for scores of 3 and 7 (P < 0.001). The scale was also validated for distinguishing between normal and abnormal pigs (P < 0.001). Given the increasing number of animal studies using videofluoroscopy to study dysphagia, this scale provides a valid and reliable measure of airway protection during swallowing in infant pigs that will give these animal models increased translational significance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据