4.3 Article

Dysphagia in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Assessed Objectively by Surface Electromyography

期刊

DYSPHAGIA
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 188-198

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-012-9429-6

关键词

Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Dysphagia; Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Surface electromyography (sEMG); Assessment; Neuromuscular disease

资金

  1. Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective swallowing assessment is indicated in the management of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Surface electromyography (sEMG) provides a non-invasive, objective method of quantifying muscle activity. It was hypothesised that the measurement of sEMG activity during swallowing would distinguish between preserved and disordered swallow function in DMD. This comparative study investigated the peak, duration, and relative timing of muscle activity during swallowing of four muscle groups: orbicularis oris, masseter, submental, and infrahyoid. The study included three groups of participants: Nine DMD patients with dysphagia (mean age = 21.7 +/- A 4.2 years), six DMD patients with preserved swallow function (21.0 +/- A 3.0 years), and 12 healthy controls (24.8 +/- A 3.1 years). Dysphagic DMD participants produced significantly higher normalised peak amplitude measurements than the healthy control group for masseter (61.77 vs. 5.07; p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.01) and orbicularis oris muscles (71.87 vs. 26.22; p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.05). Intrasubject variability for masseter peak amplitude was significantly greater for dysphagic DMD participants than the other groups (16.01 vs. 5.86 vs. 2.18; p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.05). There were no differences in timing measurements between groups. Different characteristic sEMG waveforms were observed for the three groups. sEMG provides useful physiological information for the evaluation of swallowing in DMD patients, justifying further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据