4.5 Article

Equilibrium Molecular Thermodynamics from Kirkwood Sampling

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 119, 期 20, 页码 6155-6169

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b01800

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council
  2. EPSRC [EP/I001352/1]
  3. JSPS
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25102001, 25247071, 25102009, 15K21708] Funding Source: KAKEN
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I001352/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/I001352/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present two methods for barrierless equilibrium sampling of molecular systems based on the recently proposed Kirkwood method (j Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 134102). Kirkwood sampling employs low-order correlations among internal coordinates of a molecule for random (or non-Markovian) sampling of the high dimensional conformational space. This is a geometrical sampling method independent of the potential energy surface. The first method is a variant of biased Monte Carlo, where Kirkwood sampling is used for generating trial Monte Carlo moves. Using this method, equilibrium distributions corresponding to different temperatures and potential energy functions can be generated from a given set of low-order correlations. Since Kirkwood samples are generated independently, this method is ideally suited for massively parallel distributed computing. The second approach is a variant of reservoir replica exchange, where Kirkwood sampling is used to construct a reservoir of conformations, which exchanges conformations with the replicas performing equilibrium sampling corresponding to different thermodynamic states. Coupling with the Kirkwood reservoir enhances sampling by facilitating global jumps in the conformational space. The efficiency of both methods depends on the overlap of the Kirkwood distribution with the target equilibrium distribution. We present proof-of-concept results for a model nine-atom linear molecule and alanine dipeptide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据