4.7 Article

Dyeing of PET/co-PP composite fibers using supercritical carbon dioxide

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 163-166

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.01.023

关键词

Polyester/co-polypropylene composite fibers; Disperse dye; Supercritical carbondioxide; Annealing; Scanning electron microscope; Optical microscope

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polypropylene (PP) is a widely used synthetic fiber. Due to its advantages, PP has been used for numerous applications. However, the utilization of PP is limited by poor dye-ability. To improve this, the fiber is typically composited with polyester (PET), which is dyed with a disperse dye using either the conventional method or with a high technology such as Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2). In this investigation, the sheath-core polyester/co-polypropylene composite fibers (PET/co-PP fibers) were annealed at 150 C for 1 h and dyed with three types of disperse dyes using scCO2 at the various dyeing temperatures and pressures. Optical and scanning electron microscopes (SEM) were used to examine the cross section of the fibers. Extraction of disperse dye in the fibers was carried out followed by quantification of the dye contents. SEM images showed the order distribution of core-PET which was affected due to molecular reorientation after annealing. Dye content in the fibers varied with the type of fiber, dyeing temperatures and pressures. Remarkably increased dye contents were found from 100 to 120 C. The dye-ability of the fibers was found to be more profound for pressure variation than for the variation of temperature. No dye content was found in the fibers dyed at 50 MPa, but significant increases in the dye content were observed at higher pressures. Images from optical microscope confirmed that high color depth was found in fibers dyed at higher pressure than obviously seen in PET core. However, uniformly dyed PET/co-PP fibers were, typically observed. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据