4.7 Article

The effects of the number of anchoring groups and N-substitution on the performance of phenoxazine dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 13-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.10.005

关键词

Dye-sensitized solar cells; Phenoxazine dyes; Di-anchor; N-substituent; Dihedral angle; Dye adsorption

资金

  1. Korea Ministry of Knowledge Economy [10038599]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10038599] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four novel phenoxazine-based organic sensitizers were synthesized and applied to dye-sensitized solar cells. Cyanoacrylic acid as an additional anchoring group was introduced to the phenoxazine for efficient electron extraction from the donor part, and an N-substituent was added to suppress dye aggregation. The photophysical, electrochemical and photovoltaic properties of the solar cells based on these dyes were investigated to study the effects of these substituents on the performance of the dye-sensitized solar cells. The additional cyanoacrylic acid acceptor improved the short-circuit current because it widened the absorption ranges of the dyes, although it also increased the recombination rate. The N-methoxyphenyl unit decrease charge recombinations, resulting in higher open-circuit voltage. However, the bulky substituent decreased the amount of dye absorbed on the TiO2. As a result, the fabricated cells with the four dyes exhibited similar overall conversion efficiencies and, of these cells, the solar cell based on the N-4-methoxyphenyl mono-cyanoacrylate substituted dye showed the highest conversion efficiency of 5.09% (short-circuit current = 10.11 mA/cm(2), open-circuit voltage = 690 mV, fill factor = 72.23%, an overall conversion efficiency = 5.09% under AM 1.5G conditions). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据