4.7 Article

D-A-D low band gap molecule containing triphenylamine and benzoxadiazole/benzothiadiazole units: Synthesis and photophysical properties

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 229-235

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.04.001

关键词

D-A-D structure; Triphenylamine; Benzoxadiazole; Benzothiadiazole; Donor materials; Photophysical properties

资金

  1. NSFC [21102013, 20803030]
  2. Dalian Committee of Science and Technology [2011J21DW001]
  3. SRF for ROCS-Chinese State Education Ministry [201001438, 201001439]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT11LK20]
  5. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090041120017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two D-A-D-type low band gap organic dyes based on triphenylamine and benzoxadiazole/benzothiadiazole, 4,7-Bis{5-{4-{2-[4-(N,N-diphenylamino)phenyl]-1-nitrilethenyl}phenyl}-2-thienyl}-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (BDNTBX) and 4,7-Bis{5-{4-{2-[4-(N,N-diphenylamino)phenyl]-1-nitrilethenyl}phenyl}-2-thienyl}-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BDNTBT) were successfully synthesized. The properties of two compounds were investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, UV-vis absorption spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry and fluorescence quenching experiment. The calculated ground-state geometries demonstrate intramolecular charge transfer (ICE) occurs in both molecules during the procedure of charge excitation from HOMO to LUMO. From the data in electrochemistry and fluorescence quenching experiments, the molecules reveal lower HOMO energy levels compared with that of P3HT and proper LUMO energy levels to obtain efficient charge separation with PCBM. Two synthesized compounds exhibit broad absorption range covering the whole visible spectral region. These photophysical and electrochemical properties call attention to that our materials are prospective candidates as donor materials for solution-processable organic photovoltaic cells. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据