4.6 Article

Kinetic Analysis for the Multistep Profiles of Organic Reactions: Significance of the Conformational Entropy on the Rate Constants of the Claisen Rearrangement

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 119, 期 48, 页码 11641-11649

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b09447

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS Research Fellowships
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  3. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) in the Area of Establishment of Molecular Technology towards the Creation of New Functions at Hokkaido University
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15J02125, 25287105, 15KT0055, 25650044] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The significance of kinetic analysis as a tool for understanding the reactivity and selectivity of organic reactions has recently been recognized. However, conventional simulation approaches that solve rate equations numerically are not amenable to multistep reaction profiles consisting of fast and slow elementary steps. Herein, we present an efficient and robust approach for evaluating the overall rate constants of multistep reactions via the recursive contraction of the rate equations to give the overall rate constants for the products and byproducts. This new method was applied to the Claisen rearrangement of allyl vinyl ether, as well as a substituted allyl vinyl ether. Notably, the profiles of these reactions contained 23 and 84 local minima, and 66 and 278 transition states, respectively. The overall rate constant for the Claisen rearrangement of allyl vinyl ether was consistent with the experimental value. The selectivity of the Claisen rearrangement reaction has also been assessed using a substituted allyl vinyl ether. The results of this study showed that the conformational entropy in these flexible chain molecules had a substantial impact on the overall rate constants. This new method could therefore be used to estimate the overall rate constants of various other organic reactions involving flexible molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据