4.3 Article

Rationalizing Prescribing for Older Patients with Multimorbidity: Considering Time to Benefit

期刊

DRUGS & AGING
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 655-666

出版社

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-013-0095-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. K23 from the National Institute on Aging [K23AG038476]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R21 HS017621]
  3. University of Michigan Older Americans Independence Center (NIA)
  4. Hartford Foundation
  5. Medical Student Training in Aging Research (MSTAR) through the American Federation for Aging Research (AFAR)
  6. R21 from the Agency for Healthcare Related Quality, Improving Clinical Practice Guidelines for Complex Patients [HS018597-01]
  7. Paul Beeson Career Development Award Program from the National Institute on Aging [1K23AG032910]
  8. American Federation for Aging Research
  9. John A. Hartford Foundation
  10. Atlantic Philanthropies
  11. Starr Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the growing number of older adults with multimorbidity who are prescribed multiple medications, clinicians need to prioritize which medications are most likely to benefit and least likely to harm an individual patient. The concept of time to benefit (TTB) is increasingly discussed in addition to other measures of drug effectiveness in order to understand and contextualize the benefits and harms of a therapy to an individual patient. However, how to glean this information from available evidence is not well established. The lack of such information for clinicians highlights a critical need in the design and reporting of clinical trials to provide information most relevant to decision making for older adults with multimorbidity. We define TTB as the time until a statistically significant benefit is observed in trials of people taking a therapy compared to a control group not taking the therapy. Similarly, time to harm (TTH) is the time until a statistically significant adverse effect is seen in a trial for the treatment group compared to the control group. To determine both TTB and TTH, it is critical that we also clearly define the benefit or harm under consideration. Well-defined benefits or harms are clinically meaningful, measurable outcomes that are desired (or shunned) by patients. In this conceptual review, we illustrate concepts of TTB in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Using published results, we estimate probable TTB for statins with the future goal of using such information to improve prescribing decisions for individual patients. Knowing the relative TTBs and TTHs associated with a patient's medications could be immensely useful to a clinician in decision making for their older patients with multimorbidity. We describe the challenges in defining and determining TTB and TTH, and discuss possible ways of analyzing and reporting trial results that would add more information about this aspect of drug effectiveness to the clinician's evidence base.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据