4.8 Article

Single Cell Real-Time miRNAs Sensing Based on Nanomotors

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 6756-6764

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02807

关键词

miRNAs; real-time biosensing; single intact cancer cells; nanomotors; graphene oxide; ultrasound

资金

  1. Defense Threat Reduction Agency Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense [HDTRA1-13-1-0002, HDTRA1-14-1-0064]
  2. FPU fellowship from Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports
  3. UC MEXUS-CONACYT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A nanomotor-based strategy for rapid single-step intracellular biosensing of a target miRNA, expressed in intact cancer cells, at the single cell level is described. The new concept relies on the use of ultrasound (US) propelled dye-labeled single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)/graphene-oxide (GO) coated gold nanowires (AuNWs) capable of penetrating intact cancer cells. Once the nanomotor is internalized into the cell, the quenched fluorescence signal (produced by the pi-pi interaction between GO and a dye-labeled ssDNA) is recovered due to the displacement of the dye-ssDNA probe from the motor GO-quenching surface upon binding with the target miRNA-21, leading to an attractive intracellular OFF-ON fluorescence switching. The faster internalization process of the US-powered nanomotors and their rapid movement into the cells increase the likelihood of probe target contacts, leading to a highly efficient and rapid hybridization. The ability of the nanomotor-based method to screen cancer cells based on the endogenous content of the target miRNA has been demonstrated by measuring the fluorescence signal in two types of cancer cells (MCF-7 and HeLa) with significantly different miRNA-21 expression levels. This single-step, motor-based miRNAs sensing approach enables rapid on the move specific detection of the target miRNA-21, even in single cells with an extremely low endogenous miRNA-21 content, allowing precise and real-time monitoring of intracellular miRNA expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据