4.4 Article

Identification of the Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases Involved in the Glucuronidation of Combretastatin A-4

期刊

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
卷 38, 期 7, 页码 1141-1146

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.109.031435

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca-Programmi di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale 2007, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stilbenic compound (Z)-combretastatin A-4 (CA-4) has been described as a potent tubulin polymerization inhibitor. In vivo, CA-4 binds to tubulin and inhibits microtubule depolymerization, which results in morphological changes in proliferating endothelial cells. Combretastatin A-4 prodrug phosphate is a leading vascular disrupting agent and is currently being evaluated in multiple clinical trials as a treatment for solid tumors. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) isoforms involved in CA-4 glucuronidation by incubation with human liver microsomes and a panel of nine liver-expressed recombinant UGT Supersomes (1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, 2B4, 2B7, 2B15, and 2B17). As we observed, the high rate of formation of CA-4 glucuronide (V(max) = 12.78 +/- 0.29 nmol/min/mg protein) and the low K(m) (6.98 +/- 0.65 mu M) denoted that UGT1A9 was primarily responsible for the in vitro glucuronidation of CA-4. UGT1A6 was also a significant contributor to CA-4 glucuronidation (V(max) = 3.95 +/- 0.13 nmol/min/mg protein and S(50) = 44.80 +/- 3.54 mu M). Furthermore, we demonstrated that the kinetics of CA-4 glucuronidation with liver microsomes but also with a panel of recombinant UGTs is atypical as it fits two different models: the substrate inhibition and also the sigmoidal kinetic model. Finally, experiments conducted to inhibit the glucuronosyltransferase activity in the human liver microsomes assay showed that phenylbutazone, trifluoperazine, propofol, and 1-naphthol effectively inhibited CA-4 glucuronidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据