4.4 Article

Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Caffeic Acid Amides as Selective MMP-2 and MMP-9 Inhibitors

期刊

DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
卷 73, 期 6, 页码 343-351

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ddr.21038

关键词

metrix metalloproteinase; caffeic acid; tumor; structure-activity relationship

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81001382, 81274058]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents by the Ministry of Education [NCET-09-0163]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20093237120012]
  4. Main Training Fund of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine [10XPY02]
  5. 33 High-Level Talents Training Project
  6. Jiangsu Province, Six Talents Project
  7. Jiangsu Province [2011-D-078]
  8. Program for Outstanding Scientific and Technological Innovation Team of Jiangsu Higher Education
  9. Key Research Project in Basic Science of Jiangsu College and University [06KJA36022, 07KJA36024, 10KJA360039]
  10. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [ysxk-2010]
  11. Construction Project for Jiangsu Engineering Center of Innovative Drug from Blood-Conditioning TCM Formulae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strategy, Management and Health Policy Preclinical Research A series of caffeic acid amides with extended P1' groups were synthesized and tested for their inhibitory activities on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9. Compound 3f showed considerable inhibitory activities against MMP-2, MMP-9, and best selectivity over MMP-1. Preliminary structureactivity relationship analysis and docking studies indicated that caffeic acid amides with electron-donating groups at p-position of amino phenyl group showed better inhibitory activities and selectivity than those with electron-withdrawing groups. The findings of this study would provide information for the exploitation and utilization of caffeic acid as MMP inhibitor for metastatic tumor treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据