4.7 Article

Preparation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bexarotene nanocrystals with surface modification by folate-chitosan conjugates

期刊

DRUG DELIVERY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 79-87

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2014.904455

关键词

Bexarotene; chitosan; folate; nanocrystals; surface modified

资金

  1. Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, China
  2. Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bexarotene (Bex) is a synthetic retinoid that exhibits anti-tumor activities. However, the low solubility of the compound hinders its development. In this study, bexarotene nanocrystal was developed and its surface was modified to improve the dissolution and absorption of the drug. The nanocrystals were prepared via precipitation, high-pressure homogenization method, and modified by folate-chitosan (FA-CS), which relied on the charge interaction between the negatively charged nanocrystals and the positively charged FA-CS. The physical-chemical properties in terms of particle size, size distribution, zeta potential, morphology and crystallinity were evaluated. The results showed that bexarotene nanocrystals with surface modification by folate-chitosan conjugates (FC-NC-Bex) with a mean particle size of 631.3 +/- 2.7nm, a polydispersity index of 0.33 +/- 0.06 and a zeta potential of 24.6 +/- 1.9mV was obtained. The result of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that the nanocrystals were still in crystalline state after the preparation procedure. In the in vitro dissolution test, FC-NC-Bex showed significant increase in dissolution rate compared to raw bexarotene (nearly 6.5-fold). Compared to bexarotene suspension, FC-NC-Bex exhibited significant increase in AUC(0-infinity) (approximately 3-fold) and C-max (about 1.5-fold). Taken together, the results suggested that FC-NC-Bex may provide a potential opportunity in enhancing the dissolution rate of bexarotene and its gastrointestinal absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据