4.7 Article

DOTAP functionalizing single-walled carbon nanotubes as non-viral vectors for efficient intracellular siRNA delivery

期刊

DRUG DELIVERY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 840-848

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2014.919542

关键词

Cancer therapy; gene silencing; non-viral vector; single-walled carbon nanotubes; siRNA

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30973482, 30973660]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) with 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP) were used as novel and more convenient carriers of small interfering RNA (siRNA).Objective: To utilize the unique capability of SWNT to be easily modified by functional groups and readily internalized by mammalian cells to bind, condense, stabilize siRNA and enhance its transfection efficiency.Methods: After SWNT were non-covalently functionalized by cationic DOTAP (SWNT-DOTAP), siRNA interacted with SWNT-DOTAP via static electricity (SWNT-DOTAP/siRNA). Subsequently, the size, zeta potential and morphology of SWNT-DOTAP/siRNA were analyzed. The optimal compression ratio and stability of siRNA were assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Furthermore, in prostate carcinoma PC-3 cells, RT-PCR, flow cytometry and sulforhodamine B assays were used to evaluate the silencing activity, transfection efficiency and cell proliferation, respectively.Results and discussion: The characteristics of SWNT-DOTAP, i.e. an average size of 194.49nm, a zeta potential of 45.16 mV and lower cytotoxicity than Lipofectamine 2000, indicated that this vector was suitable for siRNA delivery. Moreover, after interaction with SWNT-DOTAP, siRNA of human telomerase reverse transcriptase was bound, condensed and stabilized. In PC-3 cells, SWNT-DOTAP/siRNA exhibited 82.6% silencing activity and 92% transfection efficiency. Furthermore, the complexes inhibited cell proliferation by 42.1%.Conclusion: SWNT-DOTAP may be a promising siRNA delivery vector for gene-based therapeutic applications in cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据