4.2 Article

Hair straightening products and the risk of occupational formaldehyde exposure in hairstylists

期刊

DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 488-495

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01480545.2018.1508215

关键词

Occupational exposure; formaldehyde; genotoxicity; micronucleus; peripheral blood lymphocytes; epithelial buccal cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hair straitening products are widely used by hairstylists. Many keratin-based hair smoothing products contain formaldehyde. This study aimed to investigate occupational formaldehyde exposure among hairstylists dealing with hair straightening products and the relation between genotoxicity biomarkers and the short-term formaldehyde exposure concentrations and the working years. The study was carried out in Cairo, Egypt on 60 hairstylists use hair straightening products divided into two groups according to the working years. All hairstylists were subjected to micronucleus (MN) frequencies in both epithelial buccal cells (EBC) and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). Fifteen-minute (min) formaldehyde exposure concentrations were measured at workplace during hair straightening procedure. Fifteen-minute formaldehyde concentrations in both groups exceeded the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist thresholds levels. The MN frequencies in EBC and PBL showed a significant increase in group II in comparison to control and group I, which in turn showed a significant increase in MN frequency in PBL and a nonsignificant increase in the MN frequency in EBC when compared to control. A positive correlation was found between genotoxicity biomarkers and working years. Occupational exposures to hair straightening products in the studied hairstylist were found to expose them to formaldehyde concentrations that exceeded the standard limits. All selected genotoxicity biomarkers showed a significant increase in exposed workers and were positively correlated to the duration of exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据