4.2 Article

Staurosporine induces apoptosis and necroptosis in cultured rat astrocytes

期刊

DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 399-405

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/01480545.2011.633087

关键词

Astrocytes; staurosporine; necrostatin-1; apoptosis; necroptosis; flow cytometry

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P3-0067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apoptosis and necroptosis are highly regulated, interconnected forms of a cell death. The distinction between them is critical, because necroptosis may cause significant cell loss and local inflammation, whereas apoptosis is essential for tissue homeostasis. The same stimulus can induce both apoptosis and necroptosis. Both forms of a cell death were detected in various pathologies, including pathologies in the central nervous system. Astrocytes are a large, heterogeneous cell population in the central nervous system, with many supportive, developmental functions. Although their demise may seriously impair normal functions of the central nervous system, it is still poorly understood. In this study, apoptosis and necroptosis were induced in cultured rat astrocytes by staurosporine. When a low concentration (10(-7) M) of staurosporine was applied, a significantly increased proportion of early apoptotic cells was detected after regeneration in a staurosporine free medium. The proportion of necroptotic cells was already increased without regeneration after 3 hours of exposure to staurosporine. When a higher (10(-6) M) concentration of staurosporine was applied, further significantly increased necroptosis was detected after regeneration in a staurosporine free medium. Necroptosis was significantly reduced when RIP1 kinase was inhibited by necrostatin-1, whereas inhibition of caspases with z-vad-fmk, an irreversible pan-caspase inhibitor, did not prevent necroptosis. This report of necroptosis induced by staurosporine represents a simple approach for the in vitro induction and detection of apoptosis and necroptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据