4.4 Article

Separating intentional inhibition of prepotent responses and resistance to proactive interference in alcohol-dependent individuals

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 128, 期 3, 页码 200-205

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.08.021

关键词

Alcoholism; Impulsivity; Inhibitions

资金

  1. ESRC [ES/J00815X/1]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/J00815X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. ESRC [ES/J00815X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Impulsivity is a hallmark of addictive behaviors. Addicts' weakened inhibition of irrelevant prepotent responses is commonly thought to explain this association. However, inhibition is not a unitary mechanism. This study investigated the efficiency of overcoming competition due to irrelevant responses (i.e., inhibition of a prepotent response) and overcoming competition in memory (i.e., resistance to proactive interference) in sober and recently detoxified alcohol-dependent individuals. Methods: Three cognitive tasks assessing the inhibition of a prepotent response (Hayling task, anti-saccade task and Stroop task) and two tasks tapping into the capacity to resist proactive interference (cued recall, Brown-Peterson variant) were administered to 30 non-amnesic recently detoxified alcohol-dependent individuals and 30 matched healthy participants without alcohol dependency. In addition, possible confounds such as verbal updating in working memory was assessed. Results: Alcohol-dependent subjects performed worse than healthy participants on the three cognitive tasks assessing the inhibition of irrelevant prepotent responses but group performance was similar in the tasks assessing overcoming proactive interference in memory, updating of working memory and abstract reasoning. Conclusions: These findings suggest that alcohol-dependence is mainly associated with impaired capacity to intentionally suppress irrelevant prepotent response information. Control of proactive interference from memory is preserved. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据