4.4 Article

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection and increases in viral load in a prospective cohort of young, HIV-uninfected injection drug users

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 166-171

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.06.005

关键词

Hepatitis C; Chronic; Injection drug use; Longitudinal; Viral load

资金

  1. National Institute of Drug Abuse [5R01DA13765]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection, defined as persistent RNA (viral load) for at least 6 months, accounts for up to 50% of all cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and liver cancer cases. Moreover, elevated HCV viral load is consistently associated with high infectivity and poor therapy response. This study aims to identify modifiable behavioral correlates both chronic HCV infection and increases in viral load over time among injection drug users (IDUs). Methods: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were performed using self-interview and serological data from a prospective cohort study (2002-2006) among young (age 18-35), HIV-negative, HCV therapy-naive IDUs (n = 113) from metropolitan Chicago, Illinois, USA. Results: After adjustment for age, gender and race/ethnicity, using drugs measured or mixed in someone else's syringe (odds ratio = 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.1, 6.7) was associated with chronic (n = 75.66%) versus resolved (n = 38, 34%) HCV infection status. Among chronically-infected IDUs, injecting with a new, sterile syringe infrequently (<1/2 half the time when injecting) compared to frequently (1/2 the time or more when injecting) was associated with increases in viral load over time after adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity and time effects. Conclusions: Reductions in risky injection-related practices among young IDUs may ameliorate both the burden of chronic HCV infection-related liver disease and elevated viral load-related poor treatment response. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据