4.4 Article

Adults with a family history of alcohol related problems are more impulsive on measures of response initiation and response inhibition

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 117, 期 2-3, 页码 198-203

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.02.001

关键词

Impulsivity; Alcohol use disorder; Family history; Risk; Vulnerability

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-AA12046, R01-AA014988, R01-DA026868, KL2-RR025766, T32-AA00765]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous studies have found individuals with family histories of alcohol use disorders are more impulsive on some but not all laboratory behavioral measures, suggesting deficits on specific forms of impulse control. However, drawing conclusions is tenuous because these different measures have not been administered together in the same group of participants. Methods: In the present study, we compared healthy 21-35 year old adults with family histories of alcohol related problems (FHAP+) or without such histories (FHAP-) on behavioral measures of response inhibition, response initiation, and consequence sensitivity impulsivity. FHAP+ (n = 36) and FHAP- (n = 36) participants were compared on performance on the Immediate Memory Task (IMT, response initiation), GoStop Impulsivity Paradigm (GoStop, response inhibition), Two Choice Impulsivity Paradigm (TCIP, consequence sensitivity) and Single Key Impulsivity Paradigm (SKIP, consequence sensitivity). Results: FHAP+ individuals were more impulsive on the IMT and GoStop but not on the TCIP or SKIP. Conclusions: These results suggest that response initiation and response inhibition impulsivity are increased in individuals with family histories of alcohol related problems despite not having alcohol or drug use disorders themselves. In contrast, increased consequence sensitivity impulsivity may be associated with additional risk factors such as more severe family histories of alcohol use disorders, or it may be increased as a consequence of heavy drug or alcohol use. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据