4.4 Article

Geographical clustering of cannabis use: Results from the New Zealand Mental Health Survey 2003-2004

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 99, 期 1-3, 页码 309-316

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.002

关键词

Cannabis; Marijuana; Epidemiology; New Zealand; Alternating logistic regression; Spatial clustering

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Alcohol Advisory Council and Health Research Council of New Zealand
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [K05DA015799, R01DA016559]
  3. United States National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH070884]
  4. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  5. Pfizer Foundation
  6. US Public Health Service [R13-MH066849, R01-MH069864, R01 DA016558]
  7. Fogarty International Center [FIRCA R01-TW006481]
  8. Pan American Health Organization
  9. Eli Lilly and Company
  10. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  11. GlaxoSmith Kline
  12. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  13. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R13MH066849, R01MH069864, R01MH070884] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  14. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA016558, K05DA015799] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In epidemiology, it always has been important to study local area patterns of disease occurrence. New methods to quantify local area and household clustering of disease emerged late in the 19th Century and were refined during the 20th century. Nonetheless, multi-level models to estimate local area clustering of illegal drug use did not appear until the 1990s, and to date, there is just one study with estimates of local neighbourhood clustering of cannabis use, based on a United States sample. Here, seeking the first replication of that single prior study. We estimate the degree to which cannabis use might cluster within neighbours of New Zealand (NZ), and we also study higher level clustering and suspected individual-level determinants of recent cannabis use. Methods: A national probability community sample (n=12,992) of adults aged 16 years or more with standardized assessment of cannabis use. Alternating logistic regression produced estimates for cannabis clustering. Results: In NZ, use of cannabis was common: 41.6% had ever used it and 13.1% had used it in the past year. There was clustering within the smallest local areas (pairwise odds ratio = 1.3-1.5) but not within larger government districts (PWOR = 1.02). Age, male sex, ethnicity, education, and marital status were all associated with cannabis use, but did not account for observed clustering. Conclusions: Neighborhood clustering of recent cannabis use has emerged in New Zealand, as in the US. Standard individual-level characteristics explain only some of this clustering. Other explanations must be sought, perhaps including personal networks and local supply. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据